
With a chance at the NBA finals looking increasingly more attainable, let’s take a moment to appreciate the out-of-the-box thinking of the Memphis Grizzlies’ in game music selectors. Creating an atmosphere that doesn’t rely solely Pit Bull and other top 40 jams, the Grizz are fast becoming one of the most innovative teams in the NBA. Trying to face the towering Gasol and Randolph tandem is nearly impossible as it is- but throw in this new approach to music and you get something the NBA has never seen. Hopefully the rest of the league takes notice.
-Charlie Arrendale

In what songwriter David Frazier referred to as the modern David and Goliath, a black owned law firm, now based in Atlanta, GA, settled with Sony Music over claims that the label persuaded artists to use other means of representation. The details of the settlement, which was filed a decade ago, were not released, but James L. Walker Jr., leader of the firm, alleges that Verity Gospel Division, a division of Sony BMG, often threatened clients who used his firm. Additionally, Walker claimed the label defamed the firm and intentionally omitted the company from album credits.
“For decades black lawyers have been treated with second class treatment and constantly having to prove that they can do quality legal work. It is very harmful when representatives from Sony, a major player, encourages and fosters these false stereotypes…knowing we work twice as hard as everyone,” said Walker. “Often labels want artists to use attorneys that the labels can control –this avoids paying the artists their worth and saves the labels millions of dollars and is clearly a conflict of interest. When you decide to lie about a firm and threaten artists, you have crossed the line,” he added.
Walker insists that despite the label’s tactics, he has prevailed because of hard work and a good track record. His firm has worked with artists like Hezekiah Walker, Jamie Foxx, Freddie Jackson, Rick James, DMX, and Shirley Caesar.
- Jewel Wicker

RETRO Music Placement Spotlight: “Bittersweet Symphony”-The Verve, Nike Ad 1998
Though sampling battles happen constantly in our current culture, let us not forget about the 90s! As my college graduation date looms, I can not help but feel more nostalgic than normal recently. It is almost as if every sight and sound triggers a distant boxed-up, fleeting flash of a feeling. As I was avoiding sleep once again last night via whatisthatsong.net, I came across a commercial music placement of one of my favorite songs combined with Mia Hamm footage that contributed more to this consuming condition.
The 1998 Nike “I Can” TV commercial used The Verve’s “Bittersweet Symphony”, airing during the NFC Championship at the time. Though this song made the commercial, with its soundtrack-esque strings accompanying inspirational sports scenes, The Verve had previously lost their publishing rights over the song in a battle with Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and Allen Klein/Abko Music. The Verve sampled an Andrew Loog Oldham orchestral version of The Rolling Stone’s song, “The Last Time”, making it so The Verve only gained a small profit from the commercial through its Virgin Label recording synchronization. Apparently this placement would not have happened if The Verve had made money through publishing rights since the band’s style is not about commercial advertising of their music. I suppose I have the sampling battle to thank for this gem! MTV
Lindsey Znosko

Since its founding in 2008 Roc Nation has become a popular and powerful brand. The company serves as a label, and management group for artists and, now, athletes.
Yesterday Roc Nation’s founder Jay-Z announced a partnership with Universal Music Group. The deal will make Roc Nation a small label under the major label, giving artists both the intimacy and the power they need.

A few weeks ago we did a post on Prince’s long copyright battle, but the fight is long from over. The singer makes no apologies when it comes to protecting his material, and that’s why his label NPG Records sent a complaint to Twitter’s Vine asking that they remove eight clips that contained “unauthorized records.” The clips have since been removed from the social media site that allows users to upload short clips.
It won’t be the last time someone attempts to post the singer’s music online, but for now Prince wins again.
-Jewel Wicker
In honor of the upcoming Season 6 Premiere of Mad Men this Sunday, April 7th, let us take a little dip into the music used in this time period drama. (Of course the music supervisor for this show is the great Alexandra Patsavas, but that comes as no surprise). In the previous seasons, there has been both contemporary and time period sensitive music placed. Ranging from “The Infata” by The Decemberists playing to the bra snapping women after a hard day to “Tomorrow Never Knows” by the Beatles spinning on Don and Megan’s record player, Mad Men places music with precision for the overall few times the series has chosen to. (In fact, I happened to learn today it was about $400,000 to place this Beatles song snippet). One of the most definable placements of Mad Men, however, is its theme song, “A Beautiful Mine” by RJD2. The mesh of this heavily sampled song creates a nostalgic notion in itself, connecting about six different decades including artists such as Edith Piad, Enoch Light, and Aceyalone. Listen and find out how this trance of a tune pulls viewers in to this four time Globe Winner drama.
Lindsey Znosko
What would you tell your 21 year old self?
Say Goodbye To the #HelloKitty Credit Card
For a period during the past decade, Hello Kitty debit/credit cards were actually in high demand. Sadly, like all other good things, this had to come to an end.
Not for a lack of popularity, the Hello Kitty card was actually a victim of legislation. It would appear that the decline in Hello Kitty credit cards is attributed to the Credit Card Reform Bill that was passed back in 2009. Hello Kitty’s marketing pitch was highly criticized during arguments over the bill, specifically its decision to target 10 to 15 year olds. Its website claimed the card’s primary purpose was to help teach kids how to properly manage their money, yet it also wanted its customers to “shop til you drop”, creating a contradiction.
To protect kids from completely destroying their credit at an early age, lawmakers passed a bill that “would require an over-21 co-signer or proof of an independent means of repayment for any new cardholder in the under-21 crowd”. Although Hello Kitty was never told to cease and desist, the law prevented the fundamental part of the marketing strategy: adolescent ignorance. Powers and decisions that children somehow obtained were rightfully back in the hands of adults.
- Kameron Chatman

A few months ago we posted an article about the ongoing copyright disputes surrounding Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous “I Have A Dream” speech and today the King estate is fighting a new copyright battle.
In 2011 President Obama and Dr. King’s family unveiled a monument dedicated to the civil rights leader in Washington, D.C. The Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Foundation, the organization behind the monument, has now been forced to change their name, as Dr. King’s children decided to no longer grant the organization a license to use their father’s name.
The organization payed $2.7 million to use King’s name and copyrighted material at the monument, but it seems the organization and King’s estate have long disagreed on who would receive the profits earned in the memorial’s bookstore.
Of course, not everyone is happy about the restrictions on King’s legacy.
“King’s legacy has a reduced visibility and less substantive visibility because of the family’s demands,” said historian David Garrow.
Despite the fact that many believe the King estate’s strict regulation of Dr. King’s image could end up damaging his name in the end, King’s family still makes all final decisions when it comes to his copyrighted material, allowing them to retain indefinite control over their father’s brand.
Source: Roland Martin Reports
-Jewel Wicker
Say Goodbye To the #HelloKitty Credit Card
For a period during the past decade, Hello Kitty debit/credit cards were actually in high demand. Sadly, like all other good things, this had to come to an end.
Not for a lack of popularity, the Hello Kitty card was actually a victim of legislation. It would appear that the decline in Hello Kitty credit cards is attributed to the Credit Card Reform Bill that was passed back in 2009. Hello Kitty’s marketing pitch was highly criticized during arguments over the bill, specifically its decision to target 10 to 15 year olds. Its website claimed the card’s primary purpose was to help teach kids how to properly manage their money, yet it also wanted its customers to “shop til you drop”, creating a contradiction.
To protect kids from completely destroying their credit at an early age, lawmakers passed a bill that “would require an over-21 co-signer or proof of an independent means of repayment for any new cardholder in the under-21 crowd”. Although Hello Kitty was never told to cease and desist, the law prevented the fundamental part of the marketing strategy: adolescent ignorance. Powers and decisions that children somehow obtained were rightfully back in the hands of adults.
- Kameron Chatman